|
|
|
|
Byte’s approach towards Solution |
|
|
 |
Collected user requirements through extensive
interactions with various client groups and business
users.
|
|
|
|
Developed detailed class and activity diagrams using
industry standard Unified Modeling Language (UML)
notations depicting the various stages and the
states of transactions as well as the business
objects in the system. |
|
|
|
Developed a completed data model for the system. |
|
|
|
Created a complete set of Application Programming
Interfaces (APIs) for the plug-in points for other
systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value Add |
|
|
|
Client was unable to allocate qualified internal
resources with broad Fixed Income understanding and
appropriate technological skill set required for the
project. |
|
|
|
The
client benefited greatly from Byte’s Fixed Income
expertise along with the technology expertise in
designing a complete solution. |
|
|
|
The
design document provided a conceptual model for
creating future service components in Fixed Income
transaction processing. |
|
|
|
Project time and client involvement were greatly
reduced as a result.
|
|
|
|
